Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-05-17-Speech-3-043"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-05-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:IIA on budgetary discipline and sound financial management – Conclusion of the IIA on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060517.3.3-043"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-05-17-Speech-3-0442
lpv:speaker	lp:Pedro Guerreiro2
lpv:spokenAs	member; REGI (2005-03-08--2007-01-14)3,3 member; PECH (2005-03-08--2007-01-14)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (2005-01-13--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; TRAN (2005-01-18--2007-01-14)3,3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (2005-01-13--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2005-03-08--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2005-01-18--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The agreement reached for the financial framework for 2007-2013, including the interinstitutional agreement, is a bad agreement. It is inadequate from a financial point of view and as regards its priorities and its instruments for addressing the challenges facing an enlarged Union. It is an agreement that fails to respond to the increased needs of cohesion, and to attach priority to fighting the increased imbalance, inequality, unemployment and poverty in the EU. It is a bad agreement for economic and social cohesion and for cohesion countries, insofar as it relegates the Community budget’s role of redistribution. The Structural Fund has been reduced by EUR 28 million in relation to the Commission’s proposal, and from 0.41% of Community GNI in the current financial framework to 0.37% in the future framework, and that in an EU of 27. It is an agreement that is EUR 100 billion down on Parliament’s original proposal. Parliament also negotiated a compromise of just EUR 12 billion and then went on to accept as little as EUR 4 million, which has led to inappropriate priorities and for which we are paying in cuts to other budgetary headings. It is also a bad agreement for countries like Portugal. Against a backdrop of increased competition and facing a deep crisis due to aspects such as monetary and budgetary policy restrictions that have led to increased unemployment and a divergence from the EU since 2000, the country has suffered cuts of more than EUR 1 million per day and 15% of Community transfers in relation to the current financial framework, not to mention the injustice of cuts facing the Algarve region, victim of the so-called statistical effect. Consequently, we have no choice but to reject this agreement."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph