Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2011-09-13-Speech-2-324-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2011-09-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20110913.34.2-324-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2011-09-13-Speech-2-324-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Raül Romeva i Rueda2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PECH (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2013-04-17)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2012-01-31)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-02-12)3
lpv:translated text	"In favour. Insofar as this agreement merely extends to Norway and Iceland – at the request of these two countries – provisions that are already in place among the EU Member States, the Greens/EFA Group sees no reason to object. However, we are of the opinion that the European arrest warrant must be subject to evaluation in order to respond to public concerns about possible abuses or defects of this instrument (as most recently raised in a June 2011 plenary debate based on Oral Questions 111/2011 and 112/2011 raised by the Greens (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference=20110608&secondRef=ITEM-012&language=EN" ) In particular, we are concerned about problems that the partial waiver on dual criminality may lead to. This waiver, as framed by Article 3(4) of the agreement, creates the possibility of arrest and surrender for practices that do not constitute a crime in both countries concerned. A case in point is the possibility of waiving double verification of criminality concerning the ‘facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence’."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE ),"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph