Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2016-12-15-Speech-4-187-375"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2016-12-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Objection pursuant to Rule 106: Protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (B8-1334/2016 )2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20161215.21.4-187-375"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2016-12-15-Speech-4-187-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Matt Carthy2
lpv:spoken text	"I voted in favour of this objection to a draft implementing directive. The issue is that that the draft implementing directive is not compatible with a Regulation recently agreed and voted on last October, and goes beyond the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. While inter-institutional negotiations for the 2016 Regulation were able to secure comprehensive controls on imported plant material to avoid the outbreak of future plant diseases, the draft implementing act reverses those gains with regard to fruits susceptible to pests, such as citrus black spot and citrus canker. Even aside from the fact that the Commission is trying to water down the recently agreed phytosanitary rules, the 2000 Directive will be repealed as soon as the 2016 Regulation takes effect, in three years. So the legal basis for the implementing act will not even exist anymore. For these reasons I supported the objection."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the application of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion (2016-06-24--2017-12-13)3 substitute; ECON (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3 member; AGRI (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Matt Carthy (GUE/NGL ),"1 "in writing. ‒"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph