Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2016-11-23-Speech-3-180-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2016-11-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed agreement between Canada and the European Union on a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (B8-1220/2016 )2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20161123.21.3-180-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2016-11-23-Speech-3-181-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ian Hudghton2
lpv:spoken text	"I voted in favour of the resolution calling for the CETA text to be referred to the ECJ, for consideration of whether the terms are entirely compatible with the EU treaties. A very large number of constituents have been in touch with me expressing concerns about the potential consequences of CETA, and also with concerns about the recent apparent moves to apply unseemly haste to the process of consideration by this Parliament. Surely we owe it to our constituents to allow time for full scrutiny in our Committees of this text, and to consider whether the concerns of critics can be openly and genuinely addressed. Although we have been told that the ICS system within CETA will be constrained to a limited extent by the inclusion of a clause which ‘guarantees’ the right of governments to regulate in the public interest, I think it reasonable to seek a judgement of the ECJ for clarity and I am disappointed that the resolution did not achieve a majority in the vote."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; PECH (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3 substitute; ECON (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE ),"1 "in writing. ‒"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph