Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2016-10-05-Speech-3-131-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2016-10-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Accession of Peru to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0267/2016 - Angel Dzhambazki)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20161005.16.3-131-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2016-10-05-Speech-3-131-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jonathan Arnott2
lpv:spoken text	"Under normal circumstances, I would vote against or abstain on resolutions involving the European Union’s participation in international bodies and organisations because I believe that it’s not for the European Union to make such decisions. In this situation, however, the question is whether Peru should be allowed to accede to the Hague Convention. It should be a vote of the British Parliament, but it is not, because such sovereignty has been ceded. If the European Parliament were to vote against accession, it would penalise children at risk of abduction in that country. Therefore I voted in favour of accession, despite my constitutional concerns."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; CONT (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3 member; BUDG (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Jonathan Arnott (EFDD ),"1 "in writing. ‒"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph