Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2016-04-13-Speech-3-350-031"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20160413.34.3-350-031"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"As a firm proponent of evidence-based policy-making in the regulation of agricultural technologies, the UK delegation welcomes Parliament’s decision to reject calls to ban glyphosate. The authorisation of active substances is based on the scientific evaluation of a rapporteur Member State and EFSA. This process views glyphosate to be safe, when used appropriately, and concludes that glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Ignoring this advice would set a dangerous precedent and undermine the EU’s entire risk assessment system.
However, the UK delegation still considers the basis for this objection resolution remains fundamentally flawed. It is incorrect to argue that the Commission’s implementing measure fails to ensure a high level of protection and is incompatible with Regulation 1107/2009. All active substances authorised for use undergo a comprehensive assessment to ensure they pose no unacceptable risk. Moreover, the resolution misuses the precautionary principle, dismisses the existing regulatory framework for the sustainable use of pesticides and attempts to forge a link between glyphosate and potential endocrine disrupting properties despite both EFSA and the USEPA concluding that there is no evidence of such effect.
For these reasons the UK Delegation cannot support the resolution."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples