Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2016-01-21-Speech-4-319-609"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2016-01-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU) (RC-B8-0043/2016 , B8-0043/2016 , B8-0045/2016 , B8-0051/2016 , B8-0057/2016 , B8-0058/2016 , B8-0059/2016 , B8-0060/2016 )2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20160121.19.4-319-609"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2016-01-21-Speech-4-319-6252
lpv:speaker	lp:Theresa Griffin2
lpv:spoken text	"I and my fellow Labour MEPs voted in favour of this report. This was the first time the mutual defence clause was invoked. The current case will serve as a precedent for the future use of the mutual defence clause. However, Labour MEPs however did vote against measures in the resolution which called for the creation of an EU defence headquarters. Labour MEPs do not believe in the need for the creation of another international defence mechanism, in essence duplicating NATO. We also do not support EU institutions having a greater role in security and defence matters. The S&D group believes that the Council and the Member States should draft and adopt practical arrangements and guidelines for ensuring an effective response in the event that a Member State invokes the mutual defence clause, as well as an analysis of the role of the EU institutions should that clause be invoked."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2014-07-14--2017-09-10)3 substitute; TRAN (2014-07-08--2017-01-18)3 member; ITRE (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Theresa Griffin (S&D ),"1 "in writing. ‒"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph