Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2015-11-25-Speech-3-635-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2015-11-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Outcome of the Valletta summit of 11 and 12 November 2015 and of the G20 summit of 15 and 16 November 2015 (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20151125.30.3-635-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2015-11-25-Speech-3-636-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Charles Tannock2
lpv:spoken text	"You mentioned – in translation at least – that, if Schengen falls, that is the end of the European project. Well, for a country like mine – the United Kingdom, which is outside Schengen – that is slightly bizarre. It is saying that we should not really be in the European Union at all. I have no problem whatsoever in showing my passport when I cross back into my country. It is perfectly clear, sadly, that Schengen, no matter how well intentioned, was facilitating the movement of criminals, terrorists, arms and weapons, with no border checks. But also there was no exchange of information between police forces and security services and a weak external border of the European Union. Clearly, you cannot have this. You either have to have a strong external border and a Schengen or, basically, the reintroduction of national controls. My country also has a problem now because of what is happening in Calais. So how can you say Schengen is indispensable to the European project? Explain, please."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; DROI (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3 member; AFET (2014-07-01--2017-01-18)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Charles Tannock (ECR ),"1 "blue-card question"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph