Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2014-02-03-Speech-1-076-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2014-02-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:29th annual report on monitoring the application of EU law (2011) - EU regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality - better lawmaking (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20140203.14.1-076-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2014-02-03-Speech-1-077-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Malcolm Harbour2
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, I warmly welcome both these reports, which contain some very important recommendations, and I hope the House will give them very strong support tomorrow. I want to share some perspectives from my work as Chairman of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, together with all the political groups, which I think are highly relevant to these reports. Mr Karim is absolutely right in his report when he encourages us to think about the whole of the policy development cycle. We can get too bogged down in issues around impact assessments. We need actually to think about the policy evolution process. One of the things that I hope the Commission will do in the next cycle is to present to Parliament a five-year plan for each of its major legislative areas, because the key legislation that we work on in the Internal Market Committee is constantly up for review. And Parliament needs to start work at the beginning of the policy development cycle by doing own-initiative reports, engaging national parliaments and actually getting involved in shaping the final result. My committee was the first committee in Parliament to invite the Commission to present impact assessments to Parliament at the start of our legislative process so we could understand the choices and the political strategy behind those proposals. That has been a qualified success, but really we need more time to do that and I commend our own Impact Assessment Unit for helping us by sending their analyses of those impact assessments. Policy cycle is what we need to be looking at, and not just the fragmented individual aspects of this whole better regulation process."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2012-01-24--2014-06-30)3 chair; IMCO (2012-01-24--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Afghanistan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; PECH (2010-02-18--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Conservative Party (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question under Rule 149(8))"1 "Malcolm Harbour (ECR ). -"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph