Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-22-Speech-4-203-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121122.31.4-203-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-22-Speech-4-204-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ewald Stadler2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2012-04-17--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Bündnis Zukunft Österreich (2011-12-07--2014-01-14)3 member; REGI (2012-01-19--2012-12-09)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2012-04-12--2014-06-30)3 member; NA (2011-12-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I voted against this report, just as I voted against the reports by Mr Kelam and Mr Tarand, for the same reasons, which have been stated in relation to the Danjean report. I wish to elaborate, if I may. There is an extraordinary lack of clarity on two key points in the report. Firstly, what does the obligation of aid and assistance by ‘all the means in their power’ actually mean? This goes much further than the collective defence commitment within the framework of NATO. Secondly, there is a lack of precision in the definitions. What is a ‘man-made disaster’? Every war is a man-made disaster. Does a war then trigger a mutual assistance obligation for Member States? I say it again: for someone who comes from a neutral country, this is unacceptable. The lack of clarity in this report made it impossible for me to support it, even though I would otherwise be in favour of its fundamental objectives, namely to provide mutual aid and assistance in the event of disasters."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph