Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-21-Speech-3-275-500"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121121.20.3-275-500"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-21-Speech-3-257-9372
lpv:speaker	lp:Nathalie Griesbeck2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Mouvement Démocrate (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"In the lively debate on shale gas in the European Union and its Member States, there is no absolute truth. There is clearly a halfway point between those who are pro shale gas and those who are anti it, and it is essential to take the heat out of the debate. It would be a major strategic error to renounce this energy source now without even continuing the research. Equally, however, allowing unbridled exploration when the technique is not yet fully developed would be environmental madness. Shale gas has undeniable potential and we need to look at it seriously. As things stand, however, shale gas exploration puts the environment at risk and it would be irresponsible to go down that path."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph