Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-21-Speech-3-114-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Preparations for the European Council meeting (22-23 November 2012) with particular reference to the Multiannual Financial Framework (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121121.4.3-114-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-21-Speech-3-117-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Inês Cristina Zuber2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2012-03-05--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2012-03-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2012-03-12--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CULT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; EMPL (2012-01-25--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; EUL/NGL (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"There is a clear message in the multiannual financial framework proposal that is on the table. Contrary to the impression given by this debate, and despite the impassioned statements made on both sides, the Council and Commission positions do not substantially differ. There is less than 0.2 % of EU gross national income between them. The clear message is therefore that, in a Europe of inequalities and divergence, the funds for economic and social cohesion are going to be cut! This message is in line with the established practice of this European Union: robbing the poor to give to the rich. On the one hand, they want to extend and deepen integration and the single market, by ensuring new and better conditions for the colonisation of markets by the net beneficiaries of the single market. On the other hand, these same net beneficiaries want to squeeze the budget, particularly the cohesion lines – which are the best way of minimising the divergence between our economies – while, however, safeguarding in relative terms those lines from which they hope to secure more resources. This is a path that cannot be accepted by all those – such as Portugal – who will suffer as a result, and severely so."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph