Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-548-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities - Industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121120.31.2-548-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-20-Speech-2-549-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Marita Ulvskog2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Arbetarepartiet- Socialdemokraterna (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2012-10-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the arguments against shale gas are very strong. Much has been said about the method of extraction, and I will not repeat this; however, it is quite alarming. Another important argument is that gas is a fossil fuel. Therefore, we would be making a fixed investment in another fossil energy source instead of developing renewable energy. We must also bear this in mind. As Mr Arsenis pointed out just now, the utopia of endless cheap gas in a market that would consequently not function is nothing more than a dream. What we as MEPs must do is respect each country’s right to determine its energy sources; however, we must also assert a precautionary principle. We must assert the ‘polluter pays’ principle; we must assert sustainability in the long term, and this must be decisive in how we vote tomorrow."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph