Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-497-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities - Industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121120.31.2-497-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-20-Speech-2-498-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Holger Krahmer2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2009-09-29--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Freie Demokratische Partei (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, Ms Lepage, are you therefore willing to accept that it is a question of physics rather than a lobbying question; that if you burn gas more efficiently than coal, there are fewer CO emissions than with coal-based power generation? This means, for example, that if we ultimately shut down our coal-fired power stations in Europe – a development that is already taking place in the United States – and bring gas-fired power stations on stream, CO emissions will fall. That is my question. My second question, which follows on from the first, is as follows: are you willing to accept that mining less coal possibly also has less of an impact on the environment than shale gas exploration may have, in other words that coal mining has a greater environmental impact than shale gas exploration?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph