Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-480-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities - Industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121120.31.2-480-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-20-Speech-2-481-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Sandrine Bélier2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Europe Écologie (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFCO (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PETI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Madam President, I have a question for my colleagues about the Polish demand, because I get the impression that this debate is becoming nationalised and that by authorising shale gas exploitation in Poland we are trying to give it European legitimacy. As regards potential, what do you have to say about the figures and the potential that were announced and then the subsequent discovery that there is seven times less potential for exploiting and exploring shale gas in Poland? What do you have to say about subsidiarity, seeing as you are invoking the principle? Does Poland intend to apply subsidiarity to environmental regulations? As it stands today, this falls under European jurisdiction and no country may decide not to apply the regulations. Finally, on the question of acceptance, what answer would you give to the European public, especially those who have lodged complaints with the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph