Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-11-20-Speech-2-478-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-11-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities - Industrial, energy and other aspects of shale gas and oil (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121120.31.2-478-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-11-20-Speech-2-479-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Carl Schlyter2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; ENVI (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CRIM (2012-03-28--2013-10-23)3 unknown; Miljöpartiet de gröna (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Cariforum — EU Parliamentary Committee (2010-09-08--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Madam President, with regard to the REACH Regulation, a registration must be made for a specific use, and I have imposed the requirement that if a party wishes to use these fluids, they must register for the specific application within the areas before these chemicals can be used. With regard to the moratorium, it is true that the countries are entitled to use their resources in accordance with EU legislation, and that is why I said ‘moratorium’ and not ‘ban’. A moratorium means that we will wait for the European legislation to cover all possible negative consequences of this before we start using the fluids, and therefore it is logical to demand a moratorium until this legislation is in place; thus this is entirely in line with the Treaty."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph