Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-26-Speech-5-263-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121026.23.5-263-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-26-Speech-5-263-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Luc Mélenchon2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Front de gauche pour changer d’Europe (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CULT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". This report and the draft regulation that it amends once again fall short of what the situation requires. I welcome the desire to impose greater transparency and to give the competent national authorities powers to prohibit permanently certain financial products and certain financial activities or practices. Why would the European Securities and Markets Authority have a say in this, however? As for the rest, it aims only to alleviate the consequences of the liberalisation measures put in place in 2007. Why integrate alternative trading platforms in the scope of this regulation instead of prohibiting them? Why not prohibit derivatives and short selling? We cannot combat speculation just by supervising it a little more closely. We need to put an end to the free competition between trading platforms."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph