Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-26-Speech-5-244-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121026.23.5-244-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-26-Speech-5-244-7502
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Luc Mélenchon2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Front de gauche pour changer d’Europe (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; CULT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	". This report has two important elements. The first, and the most important, is that it reveals that most of the complaints about maladministration relate to the European Commission, further proof of the impenetrable nature of that unmonitored body. The second is a reminder: the European Ombudsman serves no purpose. If the budget it receives were spent on translating the documents that we are working on, the money would at least do some good. I should point out that the documents produced by the Commission are sometimes not translated for several weeks, that Members’ speeches in plenary have not been translated for nearly a year and that we still, as always, have to work on texts in English. The European institutions are supposed to work in all of the EU languages. Their inability to do so is the result of maladministration."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph