Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-25-Speech-4-320-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121025.26.4-320-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-25-Speech-4-319-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Luc Mélenchon2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Front de gauche pour changer d’Europe (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CULT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". The amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on measures against dumping by third-country companies could have been the chance for Parliament to revisit the list of criteria taken into account when measuring such dumping. The practice of artificially low wages compared to wealth generated and to European wages (wage dumping), the existence of tax exemptions or reduced taxes for companies (tax dumping) and the danger to the ecosystem (environmental dumping) are all criteria that should have been used to determine whether or not dumping is taking place. Instead, the Committee on International Trade contented itself with approving the Commission’s proposal that it could judge, more arbitrarily and without having to respect deadlines, which undertaking merited ‘market economy treatment’. Is the Commission the only judge of the market? Who judges the Commission, then? The market? I vote against this inept text."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph