Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-25-Speech-4-318-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121025.26.4-318-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-25-Speech-4-318-0022
lpv:speaker	lp:Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2013-06-30)3 member; Parliament's Bureau (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 member; Quaestors (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 member; JURI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 quaestor; European Parliament (2012-01-18--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; PETI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". − Having analysed the ‘Brosmann’ case against the Council, in which, on 2 February 2012, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a sentence establishing a precedent, the Committee on International Trade has taken the right decision to accept the Commission’s proposal altering the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community. This was a matter of urgency, because following the ECJ’s ruling this regulation had ceased to be valid as regards its use for the purposes of the determination of claims of individual market economy treatment made under Article 2(7)(c). The ECJ’s verdict proved that there is a need to introduce a provision clarifying that the decision to limit the investigation to a reasonable number of producers by using samples on the basis of Article 17 of the regulation also applies to the parties subject to a market economy treatment examination, in accordance with Article 3(7)(b) and (c). I also agree with the position taken by the Committee on International Trade that there is a need to introduce legal certainty and to unify the regulation with the Court’s guidelines, and also to add an amendment stipulating the time for investigation in dumping cases, which must be more realistic. I therefore support the proposal to introduce a seven-month investigation period with the potential for it to be extended by a further month in important documented instances."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph