Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-25-Speech-4-203-250"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20121025.26.4-203-250"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
I am in favour of this report, since I agree with the rapporteur’s proposal, given its urgency and importance for the continuation of the seed importation regime. However, I agree with the rapporteur’s position in underlining that the Commission proposal has failed to amend the ‘old’ comitology provisions of Decision 2003/17/EC, which in fact only concerned the amendment of both its annexes. It is well known that old comitology provisions, given the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, have to be replaced by either delegated or implementing acts in accordance with Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. However, the Commission confirms that the annexes to Decision 2003/17/EC are not expected to be amended before the entry into force of the common agricultural policy (CAP) reform’s legislative proposal on seed. For that reason, and to avoid any possible obstacles to the prompt adoption of this urgent proposal, the rapporteur considers that it should be enough to delete the current comitology provisions of the amended Decision 2003/17/EC (i.e. its Articles 4 and 5). The rapporteur therefore proposes three amendments; nevertheless, if an amendment to those annexes proves necessary, this will still be possible by means of the ordinary legislative procedure and, consequently, I am voting in favour of this report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples