Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-25-Speech-4-097-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Is ERASMUS in danger? (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121025.12.4-097-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-25-Speech-4-098-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Marco Scurria2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-24--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2013-04-08)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; CULT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the debate before this one was on the 20th anniversary of the single market. We had that debate because the single market is one of the European Union’s main goals. If the single market were to fail, the entire European Union could fail. The same is true of Erasmus: for many young people – and not only for them – it represents the image of the European Union. Without Erasmus, many people’s perception of European unity would disappear. This is more the case than with the single market because with the single market there is also, but not only, an economic advantage for businesses and for our countries. There is nothing wrong with this, but Erasmus is different, it is about students wanting to break out of their confines and discover the cultures of other countries, share the experience of studying with people who speak a different language and perhaps have different customs and traditions, and discover, renew and strengthen our common identity and our unity. This is how Europe came into being, not through treaties or dreadful bureaucracy, but through genuine lived experiences. Perhaps without Erasmus, the single market would also mean something different, the spirit of it would be different and so weakening Erasmus could weaken our Union. The title of this debate is absolutely right: Erasmus is in danger, and the danger is that, without Erasmus, a different concept of Europe would develop. I would like to thank the Commissioner for his work and to tell the Council to make a real effort to find and authorise the funds, since the hole that exists is down to the Member States. The Europe of the future will depend on those who want to study and have experiences abroad now. Let us try not to let them down and let us be brave enough to show what Europe is really made of. I wish the Council good luck with its work and hope to hear only good news!"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph