Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-647-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU trade negotiations with Japan (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121023.49.2-647-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-23-Speech-2-648-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Amelia Andersdotter2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Piratpartiet (2011-12-01--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2011-12-01--2014-06-30)3 substitute; INTA (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2011-12-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2012-02-06--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CONT (2012-01-24--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the Pirate Party questions the inclusion of intellectual property rights provisions in the Japan negotiation mandate. The vision of the EU for intellectual property rights in free trade has already failed at domestic level. ACTA was intensely disliked by citizens, and there are now additional concerns about the negotiations the Commission is having with Canada in the comprehensive economic and trade agreement. Why would we also want these complications with Japan? In addition, Japan causes us no concerns in terms of intellectual property rights. This negotiation exercise comes at a time when, at multilateral level in the World Intellectual Property Organisation, we are for the first time ever advancing the rights of citizens instead of the rights of rights holders in the deliberations on the treaty for the blind. Is there a reason why we are choosing to set aside the multilateral system again at this time and for this topic? Surely there must be better options for us."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Amelia Andersdotter (Verts/ALE )."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph