Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-10-23-Speech-2-607-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Revision of the current data retention framework (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20121023.48.2-607-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-10-23-Speech-2-608-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Juan Fernando López Aguilar2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Socialista Obrero Español (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; JURI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2012-02-02--2014-06-30)3 member; CRIM (2012-03-28--2013-10-23)3 chair; LIBE (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, Commissioner, I am one of the authors of this question to the Commission and therefore share the concerns of my co-authors who spoke before me, because they are well founded. We find ourselves with a Directive that, at the time, was justified as serving to help fight organised crime, in particular terrorism, by means of data retention, with the attacks in Madrid and London in 2004 and 2005 respectively cited as examples. However, following legal proceedings, challenges before the Court of Justice, but also rulings by various constitutional courts, which raised doubts about compliance with the standards now enshrined in the Treaty of Lisbon, and the principles of proportionality and necessity in all matters that may have a bearing on fundamental rights, which are enshrined in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, it is clear that we need to succeed in revising the Directive. It is also clear that we are justified in our concerns that this initiative, a precise timetable for which has yet to be announced, should comply with the principle of minimum intervention, that is, offer the least intrusive provisions from the point of view of fundamental rights and, therefore, the best guarantee of respect for the principles of necessity and proportionality."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph