Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-13-Speech-4-374-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-09-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Azerbaijan: the case of Ramil Safarov2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120913.36.4-374-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-09-13-Speech-4-375-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Kinga Göncz2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; LIBE (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Magyar Szocialista Párt (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; EMPL (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PETI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I have two short questions. Mr Schöpflin made a distinction between the legal and political aspects here; I would be curious as to the motivation behind this. Hungary’s previous governments resisted this request and this pressure for years, for the very reason that we were aware that if we gave in, we would be intervening in a very delicate situation. So we did not give in. Beyond the issue of guarantees, which Ms De Keyser enquired about for the very reason that contradictory statements had been issued at home, my question is whether there had been any preparations for this. If you did not prepare for this, was it because you had laid off everyone in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs who would have known what was going on in the region? Or was it perhaps because you did not ask for the opinion of the Ministry of Foreign affairs or decided to not take it into account?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph