Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-13-Speech-4-066-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-09-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:18th report on better legislation - Application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality (2010) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120913.8.4-066-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-09-13-Speech-4-067-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Sebastian Valentin Bodu2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 vice-chair; JURI (2012-01-25--2014-06-30)3,3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Partidul Democrat-Liberal (2009-07-14--2014-03-24)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the concepts of subsidiarity and proportionality are basic aspects of the policy-making process within EU institutions. The subsidiarity control mechanism which national parliaments have helps make the process more transparent. The majority of the Commission’s proposals have been adopted by national parliaments without any significant discussions taking place about subsidiarity. The only proper debates about the way to interpret subsidiarity have taken place between Parliament and the Council, ending up with a suitable balance being found between the responsibilities of the EU and those of Member States. In practical terms, it can be seen that implementing EU legislation is still a problem nationally, and I think that better communication between national parliaments and the European Parliament could improve this situation. The report touches on a number of issues which are particularly important for Parliament. I should mention among these the need to revise the interinstitutional agreement on better law making, adopting legislation on SMEs and, last but not least, making further improvements for better law making. As shadow rapporteur for the Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats), I should mention that there were no disagreements in the Committee on Legal Affairs between the main political groups, thereby enabling a compromise to be reached which will help clarify the reversal of the burden of proof for certain groups of businesses, which is something I would thank the main report for."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph