Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-12-Speech-3-543-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-09-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Implementation of the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Trade Agreement between the EU and Colombia and Peru - Implementation of the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Association Agreement between the EU and Central America (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120912.28.3-543-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-09-12-Speech-3-544-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Younous Omarjee2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; JURI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Liste "Alliance des Outre-Mers" (2012-01-04--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2012-03-14--2014-06-30)3 member; EUL/NGL (2012-01-04--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2012-01-10--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Mr Leichtfried, thank you for your speech. I think – and it is the purpose of the amendments I have tabled, which were not adopted by the Committee on International Trade (INTA) and will be put to the vote tomorrow – that there is a problem concerning the activation of the safeguard clauses. Too much is discretionary. This opinion, which is mine, is also that, I believe, of some members of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI) as well as banana professionals. I think that, in order to activate these safeguard clauses, slightly more binding criteria should have been introduced. That is the first point. The second point concerns the . I think there is a problem there, too."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(off-microphone)"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph