Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-12-Speech-3-290-125"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-09-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120912.18.3-290-125"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-09-12-Speech-3-290-1872
lpv:speaker	lp:Catherine Grèze2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Europe Écologie (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; DEVE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The matter at issue here is the future of the seas. The Salavrakos report deserves to be supported for its long-term perspective on the sustainable development of fishing in the EU, but we cannot allow it to be watered down in this way. I shall explain what I mean by this: Amendment 2, which was adopted with the help of the regionalists who swung the vote, has destroyed the call to allow fish stocks to increase to levels above those capable of producing a maximum sustainable yield (MSY). This means that the EU has failed to meet even the requirements of international law. I therefore ended up voting against this text, for, although it does take account of some important aspects (ceilings for the renewal of fleet, areas for repopulating fish), it does not take sufficient account of numerous points including overfishing and the objectives set by the common fisheries policy."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph