Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-11-Speech-2-381-000"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120911.32.2-381-000"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"In favour. The Commission’s stress tests suggest that though much improves under the new system, further changes are needed to close any potential loopholes. An automatic urgent procedure (Article 107i, directive): the 2010 legislation already specifies a list of triggers which would activate the urgency procedure (e.g. if a Member State withdraws a drug), but Member States have some discretion over this. The Commission is now proposing to make the urgent procedure purely automatic. · A new trigger for the urgent procedure (Article 107i, directive): if companies decide not to apply to renew a marketing licence (as was the case for Mediator), and if this is due to safety reasons, then this should trigger the urgent procedure. · Clarification of transparency obligations on companies (Article 123(2), directive): when companies voluntarily withdraw a drug or do not reapply for a marketing licence, they must specifically declare if this is due to a safety concern. (When Servier did not reapply for authorisation for Mediator in Italy and Spain, they claimed it was for commercial reasons.)"@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples