Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-09-11-Speech-2-027-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-09-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Sulphur content of marine fuels (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120911.4.2-027-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-09-11-Speech-2-028-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Peter van Dalen2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ITRE (2012-03-07--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; PECH (2009-07-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; TRAN (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 unknown; ChristenUnie (2009-12-11--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with India (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ENVI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, we may not have a perfect compromise on the table, but it is a reasonable one. Of course, it is a shame that low sulphur marine fuel will not become mandatory in all European seas. At the moment, it is only the Baltic Sea, the English Channel and the North Sea that are benefiting from low sulphur fuel and that is a pity. On the other hand, we have prevented a situation where all the other seas in Europe are not required to comply with the requirements. We have made several agreements regarding those seas as well. This is, therefore, the maximum that we have been able to achieve and I think that it is also good that we, as Parliament, have made a clear statement regarding what is commonly known as shore-side electricity. That, in my opinion, is a huge achievement for the residents of a number of ports in Europe, such as Rotterdam. To sum it up then, this is the best that we have been able to achieve. I support the Hassi report."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph