Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-05-Speech-4-125-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120705.19.4-125-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-05-Speech-4-126-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Peter Jahr2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2012-02-13--2014-06-30)3 member; PETI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iraq (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2010-12-16--2014-06-30)3 member; AGRI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, of course there is no disputing the fact that we all would like to support the Middle East peace process in an active and positive way. We all know that there is no easy solution there. Anyone who takes a closer look at the history of the region and the facts will know that it is not that easy to distinguish between good and evil. In most cases, the solution lies somewhere in the middle, and that is precisely my problem: when I consider the amendment, it seems far too one-sided. The way I see it, the legitimate interests of the Israeli side have been ignored. Let me repeat: it is particularly difficult to distinguish between good and evil here. Personally, I would like to see a European Parliament motion for a resolution that places this compromise on a broader footing. I would then have been able to vote in favour of the motion for a resolution."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph