Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-04-Speech-3-518-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Breaches of Schengen rules (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120704.29.3-518-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-04-Speech-3-519-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ska Keller2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; INTA (2012-05-24--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2012-02-13--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the cases of disproportionate border checks listed by Parliament in its question also show why the Council is seeking to exclude Parliament with regard to Schengen. The fact is that the Council wants to continue to undermine freedom to travel without involving Parliament in the decision-making process, without any form of parliamentary control or public debate. It is hardly surprising, then, that it would prefer to avoid awkward questions and withdraw to backrooms where its members can pat themselves on the back. We should not be surprised that the German Government wants to prevent an evaluation of the internal borders and is unwilling to consider just how much freedom to travel is restricted. However, Schengen does not belong to the governments, but rather to the people of Europe and therefore it also belongs in the European Parliament."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph