Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-04-Speech-3-325-187"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120704.25.3-325-187"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-04-Speech-3-325-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Sławomir Nitras2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; PECH (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2011-09-29--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ECON (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The trade agreement aimed at combating the trade in counterfeit products aroused controversy right from the start. The final agreement contains many vague clauses, formulated in a very general manner, allowing for a broad interpretation. ACTA was created in a way that differed from standard democratic legislative procedure. The aim of the agreement was to bring about better enforcement of intellectual property rights at international level, but the agreement in the form proposed by the European Commission arouses serious concerns regarding respect for civil liberties. This agreement creates a threat to consumers’ privacy, weakens innovation and slows down the flow of information. I am not opposed to the concept of protection for intellectual property, but the system for protecting this property should take into account the interests of both creators and consumers in a more balanced way. In my opinion, ACTA is not an appropriate solution to the problem and for this reason I voted against the agreement."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph