Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-03-Speech-2-498-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the EU and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the USA (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120703.21.2-498-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-03-Speech-2-499-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Marc Tarabella2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2010-07-07--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Parti Socialiste (2009-07-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; IMCO (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; AGRI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, there are many reasons for rejecting this treaty and these have been highlighted throughout the debate. Furthermore, having an international agreement on counterfeiting that does not include China and India is like signing a maritime treaty between landlocked countries. Finally, it is unacceptable to support a vague treaty from which the authors have deliberately excluded all democratic bodies since the beginning of the procedure. All of these reasons raise questions for me, too. Why are several Members of the Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats), particularly this morning, still counting on postponing tomorrow’s vote on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)? They are flogging a dead horse! Mr Fjellner was today’s example. The PPE Group replied to me this morning on Twitter saying that it wants to hear the opinion of the Court of Justice. I replied – but I had already been expecting this remark – that it was comical, bizarre, alarming even, that Commissioner de Gucht should be questioning the legality of the treaty that he had signed by asking for the opinion of the Court after the event. That is why tomorrow, we will vote against this treaty, which is, unfortunately, a bad answer to a good question, the question of counterfeiting."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause)"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph