Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-07-03-Speech-2-423-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the EU and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the USA (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120703.21.2-423-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-07-03-Speech-2-424-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Philipp Albrecht2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; JURI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iraq (2011-02-14--2014-06-30)3 member; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; CRIM (2012-03-28--2012-12-09)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Mr De Gucht, ladies and gentlemen, it is a good thing that when we vote against the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) tomorrow, we can have an open and transparent debate about how intellectual property and intellectual property rights should be enforced, wherever this occurs, be it in the analogue or the digital world. It is good that we have finally clarified the fact that ACTA will not be implemented politically as it currently stands and that ACTA and enforcement within a coalition of the willing consisting of just a few industrial countries would be the wrong route to take. I believe it is also right for you, Mr De Gucht, to admit this and to respect fully Parliament’s opinion that this is unacceptable. More than two years ago, we sat here together and I explained to you quite clearly, I warned you, that Parliament would vote against an international agreement once again unless you looked into its questions and requirements. What you have done is to delay matters, to ignore us, to fail to keep us properly informed, to increase the scope for interpretation of the contents of the agreement and to remove the concrete statements, which has resulted in considerable uncertainty about the interpretation. That is not acceptable. The situation has got out of all proportion and this is why it will be a good thing if we vote against this agreement tomorrow."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question under Rule 149(8))"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph