Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-06-12-Speech-2-321-000"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120612.15.2-321-000"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Against. A general problem is that the report fails to acknowledge the need for the EU to take a different approach to energy security. It is instead enforcing the somewhat mistaken point of view that the EU (now and in the future) is a heavyweight on the international energy market and that the solution to increasing concerns regarding security of supply should be handled by securing fossil imports through diversification of sources and routes via the expansion of import infrastructure and a convergence towards more EU-coordinated contract negotiations. The serious problem of the EU’s increasing dependency on fossil imports and the necessary means to avoid this negative development is only briefly focused on in the report. Specific proposals from the Greens to address these issues by focusing on a strategic alliance on green technologies with nations in similar import-dependent situations and/or with a green agenda was blended in the compromises into poor wording on cooperation on clean coal, CCS and nuclear and fusion research (there is also a specific paragraph welcoming ITER, of course). In addition, the suggestion that more room and resources should be given to renewables, energy efficiency, smart grids and energy poverty in the Energy Community Treaty Secretariat was rejected in the vote."@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples