Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-06-12-Speech-2-026-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-06-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Legal basis of the Schengen evaluation mechanism (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120612.4.2-026-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-06-12-Speech-2-026-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Adrian Severin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; NA (2011-03-23--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partidul Social Democrat (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"The members of the Council insist that the Schengen legal basis is in need of change merely because they want powers to reintroduce the internal borders within the EU. This is utter populism, since internal borders do not improve the life and security of the citizens, but put limits on their freedom. It is clear that the Council intends to renationalise the Schengen project, and to go back to an outdated intergovernmental approach. More than seeking to satisfy the ego of one of the European institutions, this reflects the demagogic approach of the dialogue with the national societies, rather than the concern for the security of the citizens. The change in the legal basis of the Schengen evaluation mechanism should be considered only in terms of finding the correct paths for the implementation and putting into effect of the Schengen . The Member States gathered in the Council want to control and change the Schengen mechanism as they please, not for improving it, but for hiding their incapacity to improve the life of the citizens by presenting the freedom of movement as the source of all evils."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Adrian Severin (NI ),"1 "acquis"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph