Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-22-Speech-2-305-250"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-05-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120522.15.2-305-250"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-05-22-Speech-2-305-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Lorenzo Fontana2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EFD (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; AFET (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; CULT (2012-01-23--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Lega Nord (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Afghanistan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I have often voted in favour of the annual report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection. However, this year I think this report is excessively critical of the Member States, which, according to the rapporteur, are all too often to blame for misapplication of directives. While this may at times be true, I would stress that this often happens because of complicated texts which are not explicit, difficult to apply nationally or strongly opposed by citizens, sectors of workers or businesses. In my opinion, this report barely considers the social, political and economic reasons for some cases of non-transposition, nor does it recognise the fact that EU Member States have completely different constitutions and dimensions, some of which internally divide legislative competence between state and regions. For these reasons, I voted against the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph