Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-22-Speech-2-143-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-05-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Amendment of Rules of Procedure with regard to the implementation of the European citizens’ initiative (A7-0148/2012 - Zita Gurmai) (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120522.14.2-143-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-05-22-Speech-2-144-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Zita Gurmai2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2010-07-06--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Magyar Szocialista Párt (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; AFCO (2012-01-25--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-15--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, since the regulation on the European citizens’ initiative (ECI) has been applicable as of 1 April this year, it is Parliament’s responsibility to adapt our Rules of Procedure in order to ensure the smooth organisation of the public hearings to which initiative organisers are entitled following successful ECIs. I am pleased to tell you that the first proposed ECI was registered on 9 May, Europe Day, and that it has been followed by five further ECIs so far. I am also very pleased that so many of you show such an interest in the ECI. I have therefore made the possible involvement of any parliamentary committee in the organisation of public hearings a priority in my report. It is our task to make sure that the ECI is a strong, credible, agenda-setting instrument and a tool for participatory democracy in the EU. There are a few technical aspects of my report and a voting list which I would like to clarify before we proceed to the vote. Firstly, in order to arrive at a reasonable compromise, I decided to vote in favour of Amendment 4 as tabled by the ALDE Group and to withdraw my support for part 5 of Amendment 1 as voted in the committee. Secondly, in order to guarantee a coherent final adopted text, I would like to propose the following: if Amendment 5 is adopted but without part 3, I propose that we vote on part 3 of Amendment 1 and, if necessary, on part 3 of Amendment 3; then again, if Amendment 1 is adopted but without part 3, I propose that we vote on part 3 of Amendment 3. I hope you could follow all that! Thank you very much for your support. And, of course, I will ask for electronic votes on split vote part 3 of Amendment 5 and, if needed, on split vote part 3 of Amendment 1 and of Amendment 3."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Zita Gurmai,"1 "rapporteur."1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph