Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-341-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120510.69.4-341-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The European Court of Auditors found the management of the Frontex accounts to be reliable; however, the agency carried forward several sums again, since it had not used some of the funds previously allocated to it. This did not prevent the agency from asking for and obtaining an increase in its budget once again. Frontex’s mandate may have been revised in 2011 to extend its remit and powers; however, this was primarily in the area of returning migrants. We are still waiting for Frontex to satisfy Parliament’s request to appoint a human rights officer so that it can fulfil its human rights obligations just as effectively. This vote related solely to discharge on the agency’s budget management, not the budget itself. Like the rest of my group, I therefore decided to abstain, so that we would not be backing in any way practices that we still find just as dubious, but which relate more to the agency’s mandate than to its financial management. On 14 March 2012, the European Ombudsman announced that an inquiry would be opened into the agency’s implementation of its fundamental rights obligations. We are awaiting his findings."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples