Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-309-187"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120510.69.4-309-187"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"We support the rapporteur’s position on postponing discharge for the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010. We believe that reports of potential conflicts of interest and, in particular, the ‘revolving door’ cases mentioned by the Ombudsman in his annual report, are sufficient grounds to request that discharge be postponed until these cases are fully cleared up. The report ‘underlines that the Ombudsman concluded that the authority had not carried out a thorough assessment of the alleged potential conflict of interest and called on the authority to improve the way in which it applies its rules and procedures in future ‘revolving door’ cases; stresses, moreover, that the Ombudsman also observed that negotiations by a serving member of staff concerning a future job which could amount to a ‘revolving door’ situation would themselves constitute a conflict of interest and recommended that the authority should strengthen its rules and procedures accordingly; calls on the authority to inform the discharge authority of the concrete measures adopted, and their respective deadlines, to properly address the conclusions of the Ombudsman’. We voted for the resolution for these reasons."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples