Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-304-500"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120510.69.4-304-500"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I am voting for this report, as I acknowledge that in 2010, the Internal Audit Service (IAS) conducted an audit of the ‘management plan system (MPS)/monitoring of activities’, the objective of which was to assess and provide assurance on the adequacy of the planning and monitoring of the agency’s activities. It is worth pointing out that the IAS made eight recommendations, six of which were rated ‘important’ and two ‘desirable’. It is therefore up to the agency to promote guidelines for objectives and measurable indicators in project planning and progress monitoring, to allocate project costs, and to promote more effective project management and procedures for checking and verifying new data entered into the MPS. Moreover, the agency should adopt without further delay additional measures to address the weaknesses found by the IAS in its previous audits on quality management and on grant management in order to develop and use the QA/QC checklist for the Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report; to plan, describe and document relevant quality checks; to assure supervision of quality controls; to anticipate business continuity issues; to realise on-the-spot controls and verification of grants; and to monitor and follow up grant implementation."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples