Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-05-10-Speech-4-192-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120510.69.4-192-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, I voted against granting discharge to the Commission mainly for one reason, which is the fact that the European Court of Auditors was again unable to issue a statement of assurance.
Another reason is the fact that the Commission still supports what are, in my opinion, highly risky financial engineering instruments, and is even preparing for this in the next multiannual financial framework. In this case, I believe the criticism is well placed, as there are no clear rules here for the use of these financial instruments, and there are not even any rules on transparency.
In my opinion, if we do not know the names of the final beneficiaries and all the details, and we do not have rules on the submission of regular reports on these financial instruments, we should not support them.
I would like to end, however, by saying that I did vote in favour of the following report, in other words, I supported the special report of the European Court of Auditors on the management of the Commission, because I believe that that report and the management of the Commission in general were discussed in detail from these perspectives in the Committee on Budgetary Control, and that both the Committee on Budgetary Control and the rapporteur have taken a very critical position on this matter, which is something I agreed with."@en1
|
| lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples