Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-20-Speech-5-284-000"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20120420.21.5-284-000"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The 6th Environment Action Programme expires on 22 July 2012, so this report assesses it and sets out priorities for the next programme. There are positive aspects to this report: specifically, it advocates a ‘right framework to ensure adequate funding’ for ‘innovation, research and development’; it argues that funding for environmental objectives should take into consideration protecting ‘biodiversity and forestry’, and efficient and sustainable resource use, thereby providing the required ‘synergy with the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE)’; and it advocates ‘planning sufficient resources for the conservation of the Natura 2000 Network’ and fully including environmental protection as an important part of the next multiannual financial framework (MFF). However, as is well known, the draft MFF under discussion does not do this. Several improvements to the new programme’s objectives were proposed, particularly the removal of references to the market. Citizen responsibility has been watered down to put greater emphasis on producer responsibility. It is important to remember that the future 7th Environment Action Programme lacks coherence between the proclaimed environmental objectives and the other sectoral policies, as well as a framework ensuring coherence between different environmental policies and actions. This coherence does not currently exist."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples