Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-20-Speech-5-275-250"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-04-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120420.21.5-275-250"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-04-20-Speech-5-275-5002
lpv:speaker	lp:Marian-Jean Marinescu2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; EPP (2012-02-03--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ITRE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partidul Democrat-Liberal (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted against the report on the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 because I failed to grasp the meaning of the article raising the issue of hunting in the Danube Delta under the presumption that it would have a negative impact on biodiversity. The Danube Delta is a biosphere reserve where the hunting of protected species is prohibited anyway. I believe that if Natura 2000 requirements are met, especially as regards hunting practices that require Member States to avoid the deterioration of natural habitats and species habitats, and should the Birds Directive regarding the principles of rational use be observed, the danger of a negative impact would be eliminated. For these reasons, although I consider the report an important step in achieving the targets of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, I could not vote for it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph