Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-19-Speech-4-358-750"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-04-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120419.15.4-358-750"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-04-19-Speech-4-359-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Juozas Imbrasas2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; EFD (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2012-02-15--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partija Tvarka ir teisingumas (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"− I voted against this because although an increase in energy prices encourages energy efficiency, at the end of the day the negative consequences of the increase in energy prices outweigh any positive effects. Moreover, the latest scientific achievements in Europe indicate that CO emissions can be reduced in part by increased use of diesel engines. The European Commission’s inconsistency is surprising in that it denounces automatic wage indexation where it still applies, but deploys the same arguments to advocate automatic indexation of energy taxes. The negative consequences for households and business would be far greater than the anticipated positive consequences. Revenue collection by taxing energy reduces people’s income."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph