Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-04-19-Speech-4-083-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-04-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU-USA agreement on the use and transfer of PNR to the US Department of Homeland Security (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120419.4.4-083-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-04-19-Speech-4-084-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Gesine Meissner2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; FEMM (2012-01-19--2012-09-06)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2012-12-16)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2012-12-16)3 unknown; Freie Demokratische Partei (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; DEVE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Commissioner Malmström, I very much respect your efforts to improve the agreement. Nonetheless, I believe that the agreement in its current form is not good enough. I could, in essence, continue from where the previous speaker left off. Of course when someone comes into your home, you will want to know who they are and what they want. However, you do not necessarily want to store data about them for long periods, also allowing others to access this information. Commissioner, you have stated, for example, that the data will be depersonalised after six months. That is correct. However, as you said yourself, this only occurs after six months. We need to take numerous concerns into account. It has also been stated that this data is gathered anyway. I do not see this as a reason to sign up to this agreement. There have been no complaints to date, according to Mr Voss. Likewise, I do not see this as a reason to sign up this agreement either. There is no need to rush. Negotiations with the US are not always a meeting of equals. I am aware of this from the EU-US air transport agreement. We agreed to this, despite its inequities, because it offered us economic benefits. In this case, however, I agree entirely with Ms Weber: it is better to have no law at all than a bad one."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph