Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-03-29-Speech-4-327-062"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-03-29"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120329.36.4-327-062"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-03-29-Speech-4-327-0932
lpv:speaker	lp:Ana Miranda2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (2012-01-01--2013-07-09)3 member; PETI (2012-01-19--2013-07-09)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2012-02-06--2013-07-09)3 unknown; Bloque Nacionalista Galego (2012-01-01--2013-07-09)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2012-02-13--2013-07-09)3 member; REGI (2012-01-19--2013-07-09)3 substitute; FEMM (2012-01-24--2013-07-09)3 substitute; PECH (2012-01-19--2013-07-09)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2012-02-13--2013-07-09)3
lpv:translated text	"I am voting in favour. This report recognises the need for Parliament to have a single seat, as has already been expressed by various political groups, such as the one that I represent. The aim of having a single seat is not merely an economic necessity, but also relates to the image that we want to project to the public. Some effective and democratic European institutions are also subject to efficient and responsible management. It is therefore necessary to set an example, and this is perhaps particularly true now in a time of economic crisis. It is necessary to make more effort to reduce costs, and when travelling by air, Members of Parliament should only do so in economy class. I would also like to emphasise paragraph 7, on plans for an information campaign for the 2014 elections. Enhancing communication with the public is vital, along with defining objectives clearly and opening the institutions’ doors to everyone."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph