Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-03-29-Speech-4-327-009"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-03-29"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120329.36.4-327-009"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-03-29-Speech-4-327-0012
lpv:speaker	lp:Nathalie Griesbeck2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; ALDE (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Mouvement Démocrate (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3 member; LIBE (2012-01-19--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I voted against the Vaughan report on the draft budget for the European Parliament for the financial year 2013. I do fully support the measures and guidelines contained in this report, such as freezing our Parliament’s budget in real terms, freezing Members’ allowances, the cuts made in the budget relating to travel, the various savings that have been made, etc. However, this report contains three provisions/paragraphs that are clearly anti-Strasbourg. That is why I voted against it. The debate and attacks on the location of the seat of the European Parliament are coming up more and more often and I am very aware of that. Of course, for a long time, it was a question of symbolism; but today, and above all, it is a legal and political matter. I remain firmly committed to this ongoing fight to keep the European Parliament’s seat in our beautiful European capital."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph