Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2012-03-28-Speech-3-241-000"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2012-03-28"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Estimates of revenue and expenditure for 2013 - Section I - Parliament (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20120328.22.3-241-000"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2012-03-28-Speech-3-242-0002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ana Miranda2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (2012-01-01--2013-07-09)3 member; PETI (2012-01-19--2013-07-09)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2012-02-06--2013-07-09)3 unknown; Bloque Nacionalista Galego (2012-01-01--2013-07-09)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2012-02-13--2013-07-09)3 member; REGI (2012-01-19--2013-07-09)3 substitute; FEMM (2012-01-24--2013-07-09)3 substitute; PECH (2012-01-19--2013-07-09)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2012-02-13--2013-07-09)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr Garriga, I do not believe there is much sense in questioning the issue of interpretation and interpretation costs. There is not much sense because this Chamber has been provided with professional interpretation services that are covered by an EU budget. This means that questioning the responsibility of some Members who are not present – some of us are often not here because we have to attend other meetings – and using this as an argument against interpretation, which is a professional service, strikes me as lack of courtesy towards the interpretation services. Another issue is that some of us are not able to express ourselves in our own languages in this Chamber, and this should be taken into consideration too."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph